Mo K (mo_k_musings) wrote,

Controversy....

...at Cute Overload.

I've said my piece. I have no objections.

I think it could have been cuter if the kitty was posed better, but "udda"wise.... ;)

Here's an example* of what I mean, which of course would NOT be appropriate for a site that's all about "total" cute (even though it is still cute at the end. There's a juxtaposition that is not the same, though. And that's the difference. And now I've all but given it away %-)

But I can post it here. This site is only "sometimes" cute ;-)

*No nudity, no sexual acts, but suggestive. Read: Not appropriate for children.
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded  

  • 3 comments